Football season has started. And I don't really care. Maybe I don't care as much as everyone else does. Let's go with that. I will still sit down and watch a game, especially if the Lions are on, but I don't plan my day or evening around it. For example, Thursday night there was a game on but I was more focused on watching baseball. Sure, I flipped over to the football game during commercial breaks, but that was about it. Part of it was because the teams that were playing didn't interest me and part of it was because baseball season is winding down and the games being played mostly have playoff implications. Also, baseball is better.
This is not to say that I am going to just stop watching football. I just don't find any joy in sitting down for three hours to watch start and stop action. One of the main drawbacks of football, to me, is the fact that after the play happens, there is a lot of standing around before the next play. I know a lot of it is the offense studying the defense to see what they are going to do and then adjusting the play from there. I get that. But one way to speed up the game is to have a shorter play clock. Instead of standing around for close to a minute (I know it sounds like a minimal amount of time), why not make the play clock twenty five seconds or thirty? Now, most people will argue that baseball is a slow pace game. And it is. And most people will ask, well how long is there between pitches? It seems like a long time of just standing there. In actuality, the average time between pitches is eighteen to nineteen seconds. Don't get me wrong, there are lots of things that MLB can and should do to speed up the game. In fact, there is a rule that states that if the bases are empty, the pitcher has twelve seconds to throw a pitch or else the umpire will call a 'ball'. It is one of those rules that isn't really enforced.
I have two thoughts to speed up the game of football. One idea is to reduce the time on the play clock. The NFL play clock is forty seconds. Again, it doesn't sound like a lot of time, but when you are anticipating the play to begin (from the viewer's angle) that standing around seems to last
forever. If you take a look at the Canadian Football League (CFL), they use a twenty second play clock. Now doesn't that just sound like it would speed the game up? They also have a neat little rule in the CFL that if a delay of game penalty is called after the 'three minute warning' (the CFL version of the NFL's two minute warning), it results in a loss of downs if it occurs during the first or second down. That is very cool.
The other thought I had was to give the offensive team three or four minutes to score or turn the ball over. Think about how a team approaches their play during a 'two minute drill'. Announcers, commentators, and fans all talk about how well a team does during a two minute drill. All of a sudden, they are calling plays quickly to get down the field to score at the end of the half or end of the game. It speeds up all of a sudden. Instead of three plays of three and four yards, they are throwing fifteen to twenty yard passes. It gets more entertaining. Why not implement that into the game entirely? After the kick off and the team's first snap, start a running clock of four minutes (because I'm generous) and if they fail to score or turn it over (whether by downs or defensive play) it is given over to the other team at the spot of the ball. The four minute clock would then start over after the first snap.
There are variables to this thought. Time outs, challenges, injured player, substitutions. All kinds of things. And I could go on and on, but that would make for a more lengthy post (a future post maybe?). Sports are suppose to be fun and exciting and are suppose to capture the attention of the fans. And in an age where we demand results
RIGHT NOW football really misses the mark. Again, don't get me wrong my favorite sport of baseball has tons of room to improve the speed of play, but that's not what I'm focusing on right now. That's for another time and place.
53/120